CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research, has set in motion plans to build a new 100-kilometer circular supercollider.
The Large Hadron Collider, by comparison, is 27 kilometers long.
It is currently being upgraded, and expected to restart again in May 2021 until 2024, before starting its final run in 2027.
The new machine, called the Future Circular Collider, would likely cost at least €21 billion. It is expected to be build in an underground location in Geneva by approximately 2038.
While final approval has not yet been given, CERN can take a more proactive approach in designing the collider, utilising resources otherwise allocated to alternative designs such as a linear eletron-positron collider or a muon accelerator, according to Nature.
The later stages of CERN’s development will be building an electron-positron collider to produce and study the Higgs boson.
That machine would then be dismantled and replaced with a proton smasher, which would search for new particles to complete or disprove our current understanding of physics.
By 2050, it could be smashing the particles together with approximately six times the force (100 teraelectronvolts) as the Large Hadron Collider.
“It’s probing nature at the shortest distances and looking for the smallest things we can see … it’s a real exploratory mission. Everyone agrees that’s what we need to do. The question has been: what’s the best machine to do it?” said Professor Jon Butterworth of University College London.
However, the plan is not universally approved in the physics community. Scientists have said that it is a high-risk, high-reward scenario with little guarantee of getting a return on investment.
“We’re talking about tens of billions. I just think there is not enough scientific potential in doing that kind of study right now,” Sabine Hossenfelder, a theoretical physicist at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies in Germany, told The Guardian.
“On some level I find it irresponsible,” she said. “Why don’t we put the money into an international centre for climate models or pandemic models?”
