dimarts, 30 de juliol del 2019

Radiation in parts of Marshall Islands 'higher than Chernobyl'

Radiation levels in areas of the Pacific where the United States tested nuclear weapons more than 60 years ago are higher than Chernobyl, warns a new study.
Researchers found that radiation in some regions of the Marshall Islands, where 67 atomic weapon tests were conducted during the Cold War from 1946 to 1958, is "far higher" than in areas affected by the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear disasters.
U.S. Navy nuclear test, Bikini Atoll, Marshall Islands
Three studies showed that the concentration of nuclear isotopes on some of the islands was "well above" the legal exposure limit established in agreements between the US and the Republic of the Marshall Islands.
Researchers from Columbia University's Centre for Nuclear Studies in the US measured soil samples, ocean sediment and a variety of fruit.
A man wearing a gas mask taking a sample from the ground to measure the radioactivity. Chernobyl, UKR, 1986
The nuclear weapons tests left widespread contamination on the islands, a chain of atolls halfway between Australia and Hawaii.
The largest nuclear detonation - "Castle Bravo," in 1954 at Bikini Atoll - was 1,000 times more powerful than either of the bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War.


The Marshall Islands have experienced rapid growth since the 1960s. Most of the nation's residents live on two crowded islands and are unable to return to their home islands because of nuclear contamination.
Nuclear fallout from the tests is most concentrated on the Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap and Utirik atolls.
Study co-authors Dr Ivana Hughes, Associate Professor of chemistry at Columbia, said: "Based upon our results, we conclude that to ensure safe relocation to Bikini and Rongelap Atolls, further environmental remediation appears to be necessary to avoid potentially harmful exposure to radiation."
Bikini Atoll Beach, Marshall Islands, looking Northwest.

dilluns, 29 de juliol del 2019

Lake discovered 11,000ft high in the Alps, in 'truly alarming' sign of climate change


A mountaineer has captured the formation of an “alarming” lake high in the French Alps after glacial snow melted in the intense heatwave that gripped central Europe in late June.
Bryan Mestre was shocked to discover the large pool of water at an altitude of 11,100ft (3,400m) in the Mount Blanc mountain range – claiming the unusual sight was a worrying sign.
Scientists have warned that heatwaves in Europe are becoming increasingly frequent, with the intense temperatures linked to climate change.

“Time to sound the alarm,” said Mr Mestre. “Only 10 days of extreme heat were enough to collapse, melt and form a lake at the base of the Dent du Géant and the Aiguilles Marbrées.”
He added: “This is truly alarming … glaciers all over the world are melting at an exponential speed.”
Sharing the image on Instagram, the French rock climber said he took the photo on 28 June – only 10 days after fellow mountaineer Paul Todhunter captured the same area covered in snow.
“Needless to say, the lake was a real surprise,” Mr Mestre told the IFLScience website.


“It’s located in the 3,400 to 3,500-meter area. You’re supposed to find ice and snow at this altitude, not liquid water. Most of the time when we stay for a day at this altitude, the water in our water bottles starts freezing.”
“I have been up there a fair amount of times, in June, July and even August, and I have never seen liquid water up there,” he added.

Glaciologist Ludovic Ravanel previously noticed a lake appearing high in the French Alps in 2015 and linked its formation to global warming.
According to the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), last month was the hottest June ever recorded on Earth.
Data released by the satellite agency showed Europe’s average ​temperatures were more than 2C above normal, and temperatures were between 6C and 10C above normal over most of France, Germany and northern Spain during the final days of the month.

diumenge, 28 de juliol del 2019

French lawmakers approve controversial bill to rebuild Notre-Dame

A view of Notre-Dame Cathedral’s damaged roof on July 14, 2019.

French MPs on Tuesday approved a law on the reconstruction of Notre-Dame, three months after flames ravaged the great Paris cathedral, but with the rebuilding process still mired in controversy. 
The cathedral, part of a UNESCO world heritage site covering the banks of the River Seine in Paris, lost its gothic spire, roof and precious artefacts in the April 15 blaze.
Tourists in Paris are still heading to Notre-Dame to take photos and selfies, with the horrific fire only increasing its global fame, although they cannot access the esplanade in front of the building let alone the edifice itself.
But the passing of the reconstruction bill in the National Assembly – after months of squabbles – marked only the start of the hugely controversial and sensitive rebuilding process.
"The hardest thing is now ahead of us. We need to strengthen the cathedral forever and then restore it," said Culture Minister Franck Riester as the bill was passed.

President Emmanuel Macron has said the reconstruction should be completed within five years, a deadline some experts see as too ambitious.
And he created an even greater furore by suggesting the toppled spire could be replaced by a steeple with a contemporary touch.
'In the hearts of the French'
The "aim is to give Notre-Dame a restoration appropriate for the place it has in the hearts of the French people and in the entire world," said Riester.
The bill aims to organise the 850 million euros ($954 million) in donations which were pledged from individual, corporate and private donors after the blaze and to coordinate the painstaking restoration work.

French luxury goods rivals, the billionaires Bernard Arnault and Francois-Henri Pinault, pledged 200 and 100 million euros apiece and they are likely to disburse the funds gradually to ensure they are spent well.
But the bill's passage through parliament was held up by objections from the opposition, who complained the process was being rushed simply to ensure reconstruction was finished for the 2024 Olympic Games hosted by Paris.
Brigitte Kuster of the opposition Republicans said: "Imposing a deadline of five years from on high makes no sense."
But Riester insisted: "We are not confusing speed with hurry," adding that the cathedral was "not entirely saved" and that there was "still a risk" of collapse in some areas.

'Contemporary gesture'
The upper house Senate and lower chamber National Assembly failed to agree on a common text and the draft then went back to the National Assembly – where Macron's party has a majority – in a slightly modified form.
Ninety-one MPs voted for the bill with eight votes against and 33 abstentions.
Riester also urged against complacency despite the high amounts pledged, saying that only 10 percent of these promises have been realised as actual donations.
The architectural form of the reconstruction is not directly addressed in the text although it was discussed in parliament, where some deputies expressed concern over Macron's interest in a "contemporary architectural gesture".
Meanwhile, the Paris authorities remain concerned about above average amounts of lead from the roof present in the area around the cathedral, meaning its immediate vicinity is still closed.
The scaffolding around the cathedral and white canopy serving as a temporary roof mean Notre-Dame is a shadow of its pre-fire self, even if the two great mediaeval towers were preserved in all their glory.
Dozens of workers are at the site every day but they are focusing on securing the site and clearing debris rather than restoration.
The vault in particular is at risk of collapse and the process of securing it will last until the autumn, according to the culture ministry. Only then can an architect carry out a thorough check of the edifice before restoration work begins.
Paris prosecutors said in June a poorly stubbed-out cigarette or an electrical fault could have started the fire and opened an investigation into criminal negligence without targeting any individual.
On June 15, two months after the fire, clerics conducted the first mass inside the cathedral since the blaze, donning hard hats along with their robes for their safety.

dissabte, 27 de juliol del 2019

How well prepared are we to deal with a catastrophic asteroid strike?


Dotted along Sydney's coastal cliffs are derelict, sealed World War II bunkers.
Nick Sais believes they're the kind of resource more Australians should learn about before the next disaster strikes.
"A lot of people just drive past without realising what is at their fingertips if they ever needed to use it," Mr Sais says.
"They're huge, they're absolutely enormous," he says, pointing to structures that look like hills, some hundred metres across.
John Broughton's homemade telescope is built into a dome on the side of his house in Reedy Creek, Queensland.

Mr Sais runs the group Australian Preppers. While he is preparing for a range of natural or human-made catastrophes, he believes asteroids pose the greatest threat.
"There are too many craters on Earth, too many craters on the Moon, to say that this is an impossibility," he says.
"People are just a little bit too blase about what could happen."
Inclusive of branches such as geology, oceanography, meteorology and astronomy, Earth sciences deal with the study of our planet’s interiors as well as the atmosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere. We look at some of the greatest discoveries that shaped this science.

It's not just 'preppers' or survivalists who think we should be better prepared for the next catastrophe.
In recent years, several new research organisations have sprung up to study what's known as 'existential risk' — the risk to humanity, or life on Earth.
Many of them have released reports describing the likelihood and impact of major disasters, including giant asteroid impacts.

So, how deadly can asteroids be?

Dr Brad Tucker says we need to be doing more to spot the next asteroid.
Many asteroids have slammed into Earth with dramatic impacts, including the rock that wiped out many species of dinosaurs about 65 million years ago.
It's believed that asteroid that created the 150-kilometre-wide Chicxulub Crater off the coast of Mexico would have been around 10 to 15km in diameter.
Australia also bears the scars of asteroid impacts, some of which are larger than the Australian Capital Territory, says astrophysicist Brad Tucker, who works at the ANU's Mt Stromlo Observatory.
Dr Tucker says an asteroid large enough to create a crater like that would be catastrophic, and not just in the immediate area around where it strikes.
When an asteroid hits the Earth's atmosphere it explodes, releasing a huge amount of energy.
Nick Sais never leaves home without his INCH (I'm Never Coming Home) bag, full of survival equipment.

A global monitoring agency for nuclear weapons has detected 26 asteroid explosions with more power than a nuclear bomb in the 13 years between 2000 and 2013.
One of these was the Chelyabinsk meteor that exploded over rural Russia in 2013.
It was only 20 metres across, but when it exploded roughly 20km above ground, it briefly shone brighter than the Sun.
It shattered glass, knocked people off their feet, damaged thousands of buildings, and caused more than 1,000 people to seek medical attention.
If an asteroid is larger than that 20m boulder, and actually hits the ground, the consequences can be even more dramatic.
"These things move so fast, with so much intensity, they'd literally cause the ground to move like a liquid," Dr Tucker says.
But all that liquefied, displaced Earth is still trying to get out of the way of the immense power released at the impact site.
"It all goes into the Earth's atmosphere," Dr Tucker says.
"This layer of dust will block out the sunlight for a very prolonged period of time.
"Vegetation starts to die. The things reliant on vegetation fade away.
"It's not like the dinosaurs all disappeared in a single instant, it's a prolonged period of global climate change, something we cannot imagine, that transformed the shape of the Earth quite literally."

Blind in the southern skies?

Nick Sais outside the entrance to a WWII bunker that overlooks the sea near Botany Bay.
NASA's Near-Earth Object Observations program uses a worldwide network to find and track asteroids and comets.
But in 2013, their only asteroid tracking observatory in the southern hemisphere — Siding Spring Observatory in New South Wales — was defunded.
Dr Tucker says this decision has left a gap in our tracking network roughly the size of the entire southern hemisphere.
"We're blind to 50 per cent of the sky," he says.
In the same way we can only spot the Southern Cross in the southern hemisphere, Dr Tucker says we may only be able to spot some asteroids from below the equator.
Lindley Johnson, NASA's planetary defence officer (yes, that is a real job), agrees the loss of Siding Springs left a gap in the ground-based network.
But, he says, we aren't blind to objects hurtling towards us from the southern hemisphere.
"That is true if your surveys are only done from the ground."
NASA also uses a space-based telescope called NEOWISE that can track asteroids coming from any part of space, he says.
The NEOWISE satellite has detected about 33,000 near-Earth objects in the past five years.
Mr Johnson also points out that his team has now found 90 per cent of the asteroids 1km across or larger, that come close to Earth.
"The population of those was estimated to be around a thousand," Mr Johnson says.
"We now have almost 900 are in our database.
"We still find one or two a year, and in fact we are working an object right now that we believe is a kilometre that's just been discovered."
That said, there are still plenty of smaller asteroids to find.
Mr Johnson has previously described asteroids between 400 and 500 metres across hitting the Earth as "climate change in an afternoon".
"The numbers down to 100 metres in size are probably an order of 25,000," Mr Johnson says.
"We have found about 8,000 of those so far in then 20 years that we've been doing this. About one third."
But, he admits, it will take until sometime in the 2050s to find all these objects.
To help find the rest, there are also new ground-based tracking stations currently being built in South America and Australia.
"Both a Space Surveillance Telescope that's going into Western Australia here, and then the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope that is being built in Chile is scheduled to go in operation to 2023," says Mr Johnson.
But until then, Dr Tucker says we're relying heavily on unpaid amateurs to help track asteroids in the southern hemisphere.
"That is literally the current state of affairs," he says.
One of those amateurs is John Broughton.

Gold Coast's 'Reedy Creek Observatory'

Mr Broughton has an impressive track record in astronomy: he's spotted hundreds of near-Earth objects flying around our planet, including two comets.
He's so prolific that he has his own Wikipedia page.
Mr Broughton works from his home on the Gold Coast, using a telescope he designed and built himself. His home is now recognised internationally as the "Reedy Creek Observatory".
"I started actively looking for asteroids in 1997, and I found six new asteroids pretty soon after that," he says.
Then, in 2004, he noticed something strange on his telescope.
"[The object] was moving perhaps 50 per cent faster than a regular asteroid," Mr Broughton recalls.
"I wasn't experienced enough at that time to know that that was indicative that it was a near-Earth object."
This particular chunk of rock was over one kilometre across, and because it was coming close to Earth's orbit, it was classified as a potentially hazardous asteroid, or PHA.
"Amateurs aren't supposed to find these things."
This is almost exactly how the 1998 film Deep Impact begins — a young Elijah Wood spots an unusual object using his backyard telescope, and a lone astronomer confirms it's a giant asteroid headed towards Earth.
In the film, the astronomer dies in a fiery car crash before he can inform the authorities.
But luckily, in Mr Broughton's case, he was able to inform the Minor Planet Centre, which catalogues all known near-Earth objects.
Other telescopes around the world were trained onto the PHA, to better estimate where it was headed.
While he was pretty "blown away" by the discovery, thankfully we all weren't; follow up observations confirmed it wasn't going to hit Earth.
But even if we could detect an asteroid coming our way, could we do anything about it?

The plan to divert an asteroid

In the 1998 asteroid disaster movie Armageddon, Bruce Willis' character Harry Stamper is tasked with cracking an asteroid in half with nuclear weapons.
In the real world, it's our NASA planetary defence officer Mr Johnson's job to figure out the best way to stop an asteroid hitting Earth.
"I like to tell people that I'm the real Bruce Willis, but they kind of laugh at me," Mr Johnson says.
But he's pretty confident that it's now possible to avert an asteroid strike — albeit not in a Hollywood kind of way.
"This is one major natural disaster that we can prevent," Mr Johnson says.
The Double Asteroid Redirect Test (DART) is a proof of concept mission, scheduled for between 2021 and 2022.
The plan is to fire a satellite at a small asteroid that's currently in orbit around a larger asteroid.
"It's just a very simple thing of transferring the momentum of that spacecraft and its velocity to the target," Mr Johnson says.
Even a small impact, from a small satellite, can push an object in space off course, or move it out of its existing orbit.
If the DART mission is successful, this may provide a blueprint to divert a larger asteroid headed towards Earth in the future.
NASA also have some other plans they'd like to test, including flying a satellite in orbit around an asteroid, to slowly tug it in one direction.
Explosions aren't completely off the list either; Mr Johnson says "ablation" might also work to push an asteroid off course.
In this instance, a laser or small explosion could launch a jet of rocky material off one side of an asteroid, pushing it off course.
"That creates a subtle jet thrust that again changes the velocity of the asteroid a subtle amount, but enough," says Mr Johnson.

Are asteroids really the greatest threat to humanity?

But Mr Johnson believes whether the Earth gets hit by an asteroid is a matter of not if, but when.
Dr Tucker agrees.
"Do I think we're going to see an extinction level event in our lifetime? No I don't," Dr Tucker says.
"Do I think we will see another Chelyabinsk one happen, and people will see it and feel the effects of it? Most definitely."
But while an asteroid strike could do a lot of damage, it may not be the greatest threat to humanity.
Human nature may be our worst enemy, says Mr Johnson.
"I think our biggest risk is forgetting that we are all one human species," he says.
"Currently this is the only place we know of in the universe — Earth — where we are able to live right now."
Dr Tucker says the problem is that we appear to ignore processes on Earth and in space that happen over long timescales.
"It's the same treatment of the problem of both climate change and 'space stuff'.
"It's always kind of this laissez-faire type, 'it's going to happen in the future, we'll worry about it later', but that's not the way to solve it."
Back in Sydney, Mr Sais is planning ahead.
"No-one can say [a disaster] can't happen here," he says.

L'atac nord-americà de Doolittle contra el Japó va canviar el corrent de la Segona Guerra Mundial

Fa 80 anys: el Doolittle Raid va marcar el dia que sabíem que podríem guanyar la Segona Guerra Mundial. Com a patriòtic nord-americà, durant...